Blog
The latest from Google Research
Google launches Korean Voice Search
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Posted by Mike Schuster & Martin Jansche, Google Research
On June 16th, we launched our
Korean voice search system
. Google Search by Voice has been available in various flavors of
English
since 2008, in
Mandarin
and
Japanese
since 2009, and in
French, Italian, German and Spanish
just a few weeks ago (some more details in a recent blog
post
).
Korean speech recognition has received less attention than English, which has been studied extensively around the world by teams in both English and non-English speaking countries. Fundamentally, our methodology for developing a Korean speech recognition system is similar to the process we have used for other languages. We created a set of statistical models: an acoustic model for the basic sounds of the language, a language model for the words and phrases of the language, and a dictionary mapping the words to their pronunciations. We trained our acoustic model using a large quantity of recorded and transcribed Korean speech. The language model was trained using anonymized Korean web search queries. Once these models were trained, given an audio input, we can compute and display the most likely spoken phrase, along with its search result.
There were several challenges in developing a Korean speech recognition system, some unique to Korean, some typical of Asian languages and some universal to all languages. Here are some examples of problems that stood out:
Developing a Korean dictionary: Unlike English, where there are many publicly-available dictionaries for mapping words to their pronunciations, there are very few available for Korean. Since our Korean recognizer knows several hundred thousand words, we needed to create these mappings ourselves. Luckily, Korean has one of the most elegant and simple writing systems in the world (created in the 15th century!) and this makes mapping Korean words to pronunciations relatively straightforward. However, we found that Koreans also use quite a few English words in their queries, which complicates the mapping process. To predict these pronunciations, we built a statistical model using data from an existing (smaller) Korean dictionary.
Korean word boundaries: Although Korean orthography uses spaces to indicate word boundaries (unlike Japanese or Mandarin), we found that people use word boundaries inconsistently for search queries. To limit the size of the vocabulary generated from the search queries, we used statistical techniques to cut rare long words into smaller sub-words (similarly to the system we developed for Japanese).
Pronunciation exceptions: Korean (like all other languages) has many exceptions for pronunciations that are not immediately obvious. For example, numbers are often written as digit sequences but not necessarily spoken this way (2010 = 이천십). The same is true for many common alphanumeric sequences like “mp3”, “kbs2” or mixed queries like “삼성 tv”, which often contain spelled letters and possibly English spoken digits as opposed to Korean ones.
Encoding issues: Korean script (Hangul) is written in syllabic blocks, with each block containing at least two of the 24 modern Hangul letters (Jamo), at least one consonant and one vowel. Including the normal ASCII characters this brings the total number of possible basic characters to over 10000, not including Hanja (used mostly in the formal spelling of names). So, despite its simple writing system, Korean still presents the same challenge of handling a large alphabet that is typical of Asian languages.
Script ambiguity: We found that some users like to use English native words and others the Korean transliteration (example: “ncis season 6” vs. “ncis 시즌6”). This makes it challenging to train and evaluate the system. We use a metric that estimates whether our transcription will give the correct web page result on the user’s smart phone screen, and such script variations make this tricky.
Recognizing rare words: The recognizer is good at recognizing things users often type into the search engine, such as cities, shops, addresses, common abbreviations, common product model numbers and well-known names like “김연아”. However, rare words (like many personal names) are often harder for us to recognize. We continue to work on improving those.
Every speaker sounds different: People speak in different styles, slow or fast, with an accent or without, have lower or higher pitched voices, etc. To make our system work for all these different conditions, we trained our system using data from many different sources to capture as many conditions as possible.
When speech recognizers make errors, the reason is usually that the models are not good enough, and that often means they haven’t been trained on enough data. For Korean (and all other languages) our cloud computing infrastructure allows us to retrain our models frequently and using an ever growing amount of data to continually improve performance. Over time, we are committed to improve the system regularly to make speech a user-friendly input method on mobile devices.
Google Search by Voice now available in France, Italy, Germany and Spain
Monday, June 14, 2010
Posted by Thad Hughes, Martin Jansche, and Pedro Moreno, Google Research
Google’s speech team is composed of people from many different cultural backgrounds. Indeed, if we count the languages spoken by our teammates, the number comes to well over a dozen. Given our own backgrounds and interests, we are naturally excited to extend our software to work with many different languages and dialects. After testing the waters with
English
,
Mandarin Chinese
, and
Japanese
, we decided to tackle
four main European languages
which are often referred to as FIGS - French, Italian, German and Spanish.
Developing Voice Search systems in each of these languages presented its own challenges. French and Spanish required special work to deal with diacritic and accent marks (e.g. ç in French, ñ in Spanish). When we develop a new language we tweak our dictionaries based on user generated content. To our surprise we found that a lot of this content in French and Spanish often uses non-standard orthography. For example a French speaker might type “francoise” into a search engine and still expect it to return results for “Françoise”. Likewise in Spanish a user might type “espana” and expect results for the term “España”. Of course a lot of this has to do with the fact that, until recently, domain names (like www.elpais.es) did not allow diacritics, and that entering special characters is often painful but omitting diacrictics is usually not an obstacle to communication. However, non-standard spellings distort the intended pronunciations. For example, if “francoise” were a real French word, one would expect it to be pronounced “franquoise”. In order to capture the intended pronunciation of the non-standard spellings, we fixed the orthography in our dictionaries for Spanish and French automatically. While this is not perfect, it deals with many of the offending cases.
Since our Voice search systems typically understand more than a million different words in each language, developing pronunciation dictionaries is one of the most critical tasks. We need the dictionary to match what the user said with the written form. Not surprisingly we found that dictionary development for some languages like Spanish and Italian to be extremely easy, as they have very regular orthographies. In fact the core of our Spanish pronunciation module consists of less than 100 lines of source code. Other languages like German and French have more complex orthographies. For example in French “au”, “eaux” and “hauts” are all pronounced “o”.
A notable aspect of German (especially “Internet German”) is that a lot of English words are in common usage. We do our best to recognize thousands of English words, even though English contains some sounds that don’t exist in German, like “th” in “the”. One of the trickiest examples we came across was when one of our volunteers read “nba playoffs 2009”, saying “nba playoffs” in English followed by “zwei tausend neun” in German. So go ahead and search for “Germany’s Next Topmodel” or “Postbank Online”, see if it works for you.
German is also notorious for having long, complex words. Our favorite examples include:
Berufskraftfahrerqualifikationsgesetz
(or shorter: BKrFQG)
Eierschalensollbruchstellenverursacher
Verkehrsinfrastrukturfinanzierungsgesellschaft
Stichpimpulibockforcelorum
Hypothalamus-Hypophysen-Nebennierenrinde-Achse
Just for fun, compare how long it takes you to say these to Voice Search vs. typing them.
Even though a vocabulary size of one million words sounds like a large number, each of these languages has even more words, so we need a procedure to select which ones to model. We obviously do not do this manually and instead use statistical procedures to identify the list of words we will allow. We do this by looking at many sources of data and looking at the frequency of words. It is therefore surprising to find sometimes really weird terms selected by our algorithms. For example in Spanish we found these unusual words:
supercalifragilisticespialidoso
chiripitiflautico
esternocleidomastoideo
So, in the unlikely event that you ever try a Spanish voice search query like this “imágenes del músculo supercalifragilisticoespialidoso chiripitiflautico esternocleidomastoideo” you may be surprised to see that it works.
French, Italian, German, and Spanish are spoken in many parts of the world. In this first release of Google Search by Voice in these languages, we initially only support the varieties spoken in France, Italy, Germany, and Spain, respectively. The reason is that almost all aspects of a Voice Search system are affected by regional variation: French speakers from different regions have slightly different accents, use a number of different words, and will want to search for different things. Eventually, we plan to support other regions as well, and we will work hard to make sure our systems work well for all of you.
So, we hope you find these new voice search system useful and fun to use. We definitely had a “supercalifragilisticoespialidoso chiripitiflautico” time developing them.
Google Fusion Tables celebrates one year of data management
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Posted by Alon Halevy, Google Research and Rebecca Shapley, User Experience
A year ago we
launched Google Fusion Tables
, an easy way to integrate, visualize and collaborate on data tables in the Google cloud. You used it and saw the potential, and told us what else you wanted. Since then, we’ve responded by offering programmatic access through the
Fusion Tables API
, math across data columns owned by multiple people, and search on the collection of tables that have been made public. We published about Fusion Tables in SIGMOD 2010 and in the First Symposium on Cloud Computing. And since the map visualizations were such a hit, we made them even better by supporting
large numbers of points, lines and polygons
,
custom HTML in map pop-up balloons
complete with
tutorials
and
integration with the Google Maps API
. We’ve made all this capability available on Google’s cloud and are excited to see examples every day of how our cloud approach to data tables is changing the game and making structured data management, collaboration, and publishing fast, easy, and open.
But more exciting than all the features we’ve been releasing is the things that people have been *doing* with Fusion Tables. News agencies have been taking advantage of Fusion Tables to map data that governments make public, and tell a more complete story (see the
L.A. Times
,
Knoxville News
, and
Chicago Tribune
). Just this month the State of California kicked off an
application development contest
, hosting data sets like
this one
in Fusion Tables for easy API access for developers. And the US Department of Health and Human Services held the Community Health Data Forum, where attendees presented data applications such as the
heart-friendly and people-friendly hospital-finder
, built with Google Fusion Tables.
It continues to astound us how quickly our users are able to pull together these kinds of compelling data applications with Fusion Tables, again showing the power of a cloud approach to data. Fusion Tables were the multimedia extension to Joseph Rossano’s art exhibit on Butterflies and DNA barcodes, an easy way to
map real-estate in Monterey county
or
potholes in Spain
, provided the geo-catalog for
wind power data
and
ethanol-selling stations
, and even the data backend for an
geo portal to organize water data for Africa
, among many, many other uses.
As we head into our second year, we’re looking forward to delivering more tools that make data management easier and more powerful on the web. What’s next for
Fusion Tables
? Request your favorite features on our
Feature Request
(a special implementation of Google Moderator), and follow the latest progress of Fusion Tables on our
User Group
,
Facebook
, and
Twitter
. We love to hear from you!
Labels
accessibility
ACL
ACM
Acoustic Modeling
Adaptive Data Analysis
ads
adsense
adwords
Africa
AI
AI for Social Good
Algorithms
Android
Android Wear
API
App Engine
App Inventor
April Fools
Art
Audio
Augmented Reality
Australia
Automatic Speech Recognition
AutoML
Awards
BigQuery
Cantonese
Chemistry
China
Chrome
Cloud Computing
Collaboration
Compression
Computational Imaging
Computational Photography
Computer Science
Computer Vision
conference
conferences
Conservation
correlate
Course Builder
crowd-sourcing
CVPR
Data Center
Data Discovery
data science
datasets
Deep Learning
DeepDream
DeepMind
distributed systems
Diversity
Earth Engine
economics
Education
Electronic Commerce and Algorithms
electronics
EMEA
EMNLP
Encryption
entities
Entity Salience
Environment
Europe
Exacycle
Expander
Faculty Institute
Faculty Summit
Flu Trends
Fusion Tables
gamification
Gboard
Gmail
Google Accelerated Science
Google Books
Google Brain
Google Cloud Platform
Google Docs
Google Drive
Google Genomics
Google Maps
Google Photos
Google Play Apps
Google Science Fair
Google Sheets
Google Translate
Google Trips
Google Voice Search
Google+
Government
grants
Graph
Graph Mining
Hardware
HCI
Health
High Dynamic Range Imaging
ICCV
ICLR
ICML
ICSE
Image Annotation
Image Classification
Image Processing
Inbox
India
Information Retrieval
internationalization
Internet of Things
Interspeech
IPython
Journalism
jsm
jsm2011
K-12
Kaggle
KDD
Keyboard Input
Klingon
Korean
Labs
Linear Optimization
localization
Low-Light Photography
Machine Hearing
Machine Intelligence
Machine Learning
Machine Perception
Machine Translation
Magenta
MapReduce
market algorithms
Market Research
materials science
Mixed Reality
ML
ML Fairness
MOOC
Moore's Law
Multimodal Learning
NAACL
Natural Language Processing
Natural Language Understanding
Network Management
Networks
Neural Networks
NeurIPS
Nexus
Ngram
NIPS
NLP
On-device Learning
open source
operating systems
Optical Character Recognition
optimization
osdi
osdi10
patents
Peer Review
ph.d. fellowship
PhD Fellowship
PhotoScan
Physics
PiLab
Pixel
Policy
Professional Development
Proposals
Public Data Explorer
publication
Publications
Quantum AI
Quantum Computing
Recommender Systems
Reinforcement Learning
renewable energy
Research
Research Awards
resource optimization
Robotics
schema.org
Search
search ads
Security and Privacy
Self-Supervised Learning
Semantic Models
Semi-supervised Learning
SIGCOMM
SIGMOD
Site Reliability Engineering
Social Networks
Software
Sound Search
Speech
Speech Recognition
statistics
Structured Data
Style Transfer
Supervised Learning
Systems
TensorBoard
TensorFlow
TPU
Translate
trends
TTS
TV
UI
University Relations
UNIX
Unsupervised Learning
User Experience
video
Video Analysis
Virtual Reality
Vision Research
Visiting Faculty
Visualization
VLDB
Voice Search
Wiki
wikipedia
WWW
Year in Review
YouTube
Archive
2021
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2020
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2019
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2018
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2017
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2016
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2015
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2014
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2013
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2012
Dec
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2011
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2010
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2009
Dec
Nov
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Jul
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
2007
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Feb
2006
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Apr
Mar
Feb
Feed
Follow @googleai
Give us feedback in our
Product Forums
.
