Blog
The latest news from Google AI
Little Box Challenge Academic Awards
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Posted by Maggie Johnson, Director of Education and University Relations
Last July, Google and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Power Electronics Society (
IEEE PELS
) announced the
Little Box Challenge
, a competition designed to push the forefront of new technologies in the research and development of small, high power density inverters.
In parallel, we announced the Little Box Challenge
award program
designed to help support academics pursuing groundbreaking research in the area of
increasing the power density for DC-to-AC power conversion
. We received over 100 proposals and today we are proud to announce the following recipients of the academic awards:
Primary Academic Institution
Principal Investigator
University of Colorado Boulder
Khurram K. Afridi
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Huang-Jen Chiu
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
José A. Cobos
Texas A&M University
Prasad Enjeti
ETH Zürich
Johann W. Kolar
University of Bristol
Neville McNeill
Case Western Reserve University
Timothy Peshek
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Robert Pilawa-Podgurski
University of Stuttgart
Jörg Roth-Stielow
Queensland University of Technology
Geoff Walker
The recipients hail from many different parts of the world and were chosen based on their very strong and thoughtful entries dealing with all the issues raised in the
request for proposals
. Each of these researchers will receive approximately $30,000 US to support their research into high power density inverters, and are encouraged to use this work to attempt to win the $1,000,000 US grand prize for the Little Box Challenge.
There were many submissions beyond those chosen here that reviewers also considered to be very promising. We encourage all those who did not receive funding to still participate in the
Little Box Challenge
, and pursue improvements not only in power density, but also in the reliability, efficiency, safety, and cost of inverters (and of course, to attempt to win the grand prize!)
Call for Research Proposals to participate in the Open Web of Things Expedition
Friday, December 12, 2014
Posted Vint Cerf, Chief Internet Evangelist, Roy Want and Max Senges, Google Research
Imagine a world in which access to networked technology
defies the constraints
of desktops, laptops or smartphones. A future where we work seamlessly with
connected systems, services, devices and “things”
to support work practices, education, and daily interactions. While the Internet of Things (IoT) conjures a vision of “anytime, any place” connectivity for all things,
the realization is complex
given the need to work across interconnected and heterogeneous systems, and the special considerations needed for security, privacy, and safety.
Google is excited about the opportunities the IoT presents for future products and services. To further the development of open standards, facilitate ease of use, and ensure that privacy and security are fundamental values throughout the evolution of the field, we are in the process of establishing an open innovation and research program around the IoT. We plan to bring together a community of academics, Google experts and potentially other parties to pursue an open and shared mission in this area.
As a first step, we are announcing an
open call for research proposals
for the Open Web of Things:
Researchers interested in the Expedition Lead Grant should build a team of PIs and put forward a proposal outlining a draft research roadmap both for their team(s), as well as how they propose to integrate related research that is implemented outside their labs (e.g., Individual Project Grants).
For the Individual Project Grants we are seeking research proposals relating to the IoT in the following areas (1) user interface and application development, (2) privacy & security, and (3) systems & protocols research.
Importantly, we are open to new and unorthodox solutions in all three of these areas, for example, novel interactions, usable security models, and new approaches for open standards and evolution of protocols.
Additionally, to facilitate hands-on research supporting our mission driven research, we plan to provide participating faculty access to hardware, software and systems from Google. We look forward to your submission by January 21, 2015 and expect to select proposals early Spring. Selected PIs will be invited to participate in a kick-off workshop at Google shortly after.
Learning Digital Skills online with Google Activate
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Posted by Michel Benard, University Relations Manager and Cova Soto, Product Marketing Manager, Business Marketing Madrid
According to
Eurostat data
, over 5 million people under age 25 are currently out of work in Europe, in contrast to an increasing demand for people with digital skills such as Digital Marketing, Big Data, Ecommerce, Mobile App Development and Cloud Computing. In particular, Spanish employers are finding it difficult to find individuals with the right skills, due to the lack of the digital education available.
In an effort to make contributions towards solving Spain’s unemployment in this sector, Google Spain, the
Spanish Ministry of Industry
through their business school
EOI
,
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
and
Interactive Advertising Bureau
(IAB) are collaborating to build
Google Activate
, a series of massive open online courses (MOOCs) dedicated to teach digital skills to the young unemployed people in Spain. This is an example of how online education can be scaled to address educational and economic issues.
The inspiration for Google Activate began with the summer 2012 launch of
Course Builder
, an experimental platform developed on Google technologies designed to provide the capability for anyone to create an online environment that can be used for a wide variety of education-related activities. In September of that same year, Course Builder was made available in Europe, as part of the
Google Faculty Summit
in London.
Among the early adopters of Course Builder in Europe was a partnership that included the University of Alicante, who in October 2012 launched
Unimooc Aemprende
, a MOOC for entrepreneurs. This is just one example of the use of Course Builder to build a MOOC designed to solve a broad problem, in this case the acquisition of skills for launching a small business. More than 30,000 people have participated in Unimooc since its launch.
As of today, more than 148,000 people have registered for Activate with 13% of participants earning a certificate, which is obtained after 13 exams certified by either the EOI, Universidad Complutense de Madrid or or the IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau). Such certificates are being used by the awardees in their LinkedIn profile to position themselves for a job in the digital economy, where many jobs are being created. More than 19,000 students are already certified in one of the 5 digital areas.
Google Activate has plans to increase the number of students with digital skills reaching 160,000 with plans to expand further to other countries in the world.
MOOC Research and Innovation
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Posted by Maggie Johnson, Director of Education and University Relations
Recently,
Tsinghua University
and Google collaborated to host the
2014 APAC MOOC Focused Faculty Workshop
in Shanghai, China. The workshop brought together
37 professors from 12 countries
in APAC, NA and EMEA to share, brainstorm and generate important topics that are of mutual interests in the research behind MOOCs and how to foster MOOC innovation.
During the 2-day workshop, faculty and Googlers shared lessons learned and best practices for the following focus areas:
Effectiveness of
hybrid learning
models.
Topics in adaptive learning and how they can tailor to individual students by Integrating MOOCs into a student's timetable / semester / curriculum.
Standards and practices for interoperability between online learning platforms.
Current focuses and important topics for future MOOC research.
In addition to discussing these focus areas, here was ample time for participants to brainstorm and discuss innovative research ideas for the next-steps in potential research collaboration. Emerging from these discussions were the following themes identified as important future research topics:
Adding new interactions to MOOCs including social and
gamification
Building a data & analytics Infrastructure that provides a foundation for personalized learning
Interoperability across platforms, and providing access to online content for audiences with limited access.
Google is committed to supporting research and innovation in
online learning at scale
, through both grants and our open source
Course Builder
platform, and we are excited to pursue potential research collaborations with partner universities to move forward on the topics discussed. Stay tuned for future announcements on research and collaboration aimed at enabling further MOOC innovation.
High Quality Object Detection at Scale
Monday, December 8, 2014
Google Engineers Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed
*
, Dumitru Erhan, and Dragomir Anguelov
Update - 26/02/2015
We recently discovered a bug in the evaluation methodology of our object detector. Consequently, the large numbers we initially reported below are not realistic, due to the fact that our separately trained context extractor was contaminated with half of the validation set images. Therefore, our initial results were overly optimistic and were not attainable by the methodology described in the paper. Re-evaluating our initial results, we have restricted ourselves to reporting only the single-model results on the other half of the dedicated validation set without retraining the models. With the updated evaluation, we are still able to report the best single-model result on the ILSVRC 2014 detection challenge data set, with 0.43 mAP when combining both Selective Search and MultiBox proposals with our post-classification model. The original draft of our paper "
Scalable, High Quality Object Detection
" has been updated to reflect this information. We are deeply sorry if our initial reported results caused any confusion in the community. Original post follows below.
-C. Szegedy, S. Reed, D. Erhan, and D. Anguelov
The
ILSVRC
detection challenge is an influential academic benchmark for measuring the quality of object detection. This summer, the GoogLeNet team
reported top results
in the 2014 edition of the challenge, with ~2X improvement over the previous year’s best results. However, the quality of our results came at a high computational cost: processing each image took about two minutes on a state-of-the-art workstation.
Naturally, we began to think of how we could both improve the accuracy and reduce the computation time needed. Given the already high quality of previous results like those of GoogLeNet
[6]
, we expected that further improvements to detection quality would be increasingly hard to achieve. In our recent paper
Scalable, High Quality Object Detection
[7]
, we detail advances that instead have resulted in an accelerated rate of progress in object detection:
Evolution of detection quality over time. On the y axis is the mean average precision of the best published results at any given time. The blue line shows result using individual models, the red line is multi-model ensembles. Overfeat
[8]
was the state-of-the-art at end of last year, followed by R-CNN
[1]
published in May. The later measurement points are the results of our team.
[6,7]
As seen in the plot above, the mean average precision has been improved since August from 0.45 to 0.56: a 23% relative gain. The new approach can also match the quality of the former best solution with 140X reduced computational resources.
Most current approaches for object detection employ two phases
[1]
: in the first phase, some hand-engineered algorithm proposes regions of interest in the image. In the second phase, each proposed region is run through a deep neural network, identifying which proposed patches correspond to an object (and what that object is).
For the first phase, the common wisdom
[1,2,3,4]
was that it took skillfully crafted code to produce high quality region proposals. This has come with a drawback though: these methods don’t produce reliable scoring for the proposed regions. This forces the second phase to evaluate most of the proposed patches in order to achieve good results.
So we revisited our prior “MultiBox” work
[5]
, in which we let the computer learn to pick the proposals to see whether we could avoid relying on any of the hand-crafted methods above. Although the MultiBox method, using previous generation vision network architectures, could not compete with hand-engineered proposal approaches, there were several advantages of fully relying on machine learning only. First, the quality of proposals increases with each new improved network architecture or training methodology without additional programming effort. Second, the regions come with confidence scores which are used for trading off running time versus quality. Additionally, the implementation is simplified.
Once we used new variants of the network architecture introduced in [6], MultiBox also started to perform much better; Now, we could match the coverage of alternative methods with half as many proposal patches. Also, we changed our networks to take the context of objects into account, fueling additional quality gains for the second phase. Furthermore, we came up with a new way to train deep networks to learn more robustly even when some objects are not annotated in the training set, which improved both phases.
Besides the significant gains in mean average precision, we can now cut the number of evaluated patches dramatically at a modest loss of quality: the task that used to take 2 minutes of processing time for a single image on a workstation by the GoogLeNet ensemble (of 6 networks), is now performed under a second using a single network without using GPUs. If we constrain ourselves to a single category like “dog”, we can now process 50 images/second on the same machine by a more streamlined approach
[7]
that skips the proposal generation step altogether.
As a core area of research in computer vision, object detection is used for providing strong signals for photo and video search, while high quality detection could prove useful for self-driving cars and
automatically generated image captions
. We look forward to the continuing research in this field.
References:
[1]
Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation
by Ross Girshick and Jeff Donahue and Trevor Darrell and Jitendra Malik (CVPR, 2014)
[2]
Prime Object Proposals with Randomized Prim’s Algorithm
by Santiago Manen, Matthieu Guillaumin and Luc Van Gool
[3]
Edge boxes: Locating object proposals from edges
by Lawrence C Zitnick, and Piotr Dollàr (ECCV 2014)
[4]
BING: Binarized normed gradients for objectness estimation at 300fps
by Ming-Ming Cheng, Ziming Zhang, Wen-Yan Lin and Philip Torr (CVPR 2014)
[5]
Scalable Object Detection using Deep Neural Networks
by Dumitru Erhan, Christian Szegedy, Alexander Toshev, and Dragomir Anguelov
[6]
Going deeper with convolutions
by Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke and Andrew Rabinovich
[7]
Scalable, high quality object detection
by Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed, Dumitru Erhan and Dragomir Anguelov
[8]
OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Network
by Pierre Sermanet, David Eigen, Xiang Zhang, Michael Mathieu, Rob Fergus and Yann LeCun
*
A PhD student at University of Michigan -- Ann Arbor and Software Engineering Intern at Google
↩
What we can learn about effective, meaningful and diverse organizations
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Posted by Beryl Nelson, Software Engineering Manager
By becoming more conscious of our own stereotypes and biases, and making use of the insights revealed by the research on bias and stereotype threat, unconscious decision making, and cognitive illusions, each of us can bring more to our work and create diverse, innovative, and meaningful organizations.
Since 2009, I’ve been reading literature about the challenges and successes in making diverse teams effective, and speaking about this research. My goal is to help everyone understand more about unconscious decision-making and other barriers to inclusion, and through knowledge, combat these effects.
A short summary:
A team that is heterogeneous in meaningful ways is good for innovation, and good for business.
There are many challenges to making such teams effective, such as unconscious decision making, stereotype threat, and other cognitive illusions.
There is repeatable quantitative research which shows ways to combat some of these effects.
The barriers to effectiveness may seem overwhelming, but there is hope! Meaningful change is possible, and some examples of successful change are cited below.
In a bit more detail:
Diversity is good for innovation and business.
There is a correlation between financial success and the diversity of leadership teams, as shown in research by
Catalyst
,
McKinsey
and
Cedric Herring
. Further, research shows a
strong correlation between having women on teams and innovation
; concluding that there is a strong correlation between the presence of women and the social skills required to get ideas percolating into the open.
We all make decisions unconsciously, influenced by our implicit associations.
As an example of these effects,
a large proportion of CEOs are taller than the average population
and
height is strongly correlated with financial and career success
. It’s long been argued that women and underrepresented minorities are not represented in CEO leadership because there aren’t enough qualified individuals in the labor pool. This “pipeline issue” argument can’t be made for short and average-height people, however. Simple,
repeatable tests
measure, via response time and error rate, the implicit associations we have between concepts. These associations are created as an adaptive response, but we must understand our own implicit biases in order to make better decisions.
Stereotype threat plays a role in preventing people from being fully effective.
The
low representation of women and minorities in Science
has long been the source of a troubling question: is this an indication of a difference in innate ability (see
Ben Barre’s response
to Lawrence Summers’ remarks), or the result of some other effect?
Claude Steele
and his colleagues elegantly showed that
two groups of people can have similar or opposite reactions, depending on the way a situation is presented
. These and other experiments show that stereotype threat can compromise the performance of the subject of a stereotype, if he or she knows about the stereotype and cares about it.
Change is possible.
The above and other challenges may make it seem nearly impossible to create a diverse and highly functioning organization, but dramatic change can be made. Take, for example, the discovery of biased decision making and effective changes made via the use of data in the
MIT Science Faculty Study
, or the amazing changes at
Harvey Mudd college
, which not only increased participation of women as Computer Science majors from 12% to 40% in five years, but also increased the total number of CS majors from 25 to 30 per year to 70 CS graduates in the class of 2014.
If you’re interested in learning more, watch the video about the data on diversity below. You can read the full
research
in the
November issue of Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery
. You can read even more using the
full bibliography
.
Automatically making sense of data
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Posted by Kevin Murphy, Research Scientist and David Harper, Head of University Relations, EMEA
While the availability and size of data sets across a wide range of sources, from medical to scientific to commercial, continues to grow, there are relatively few people trained in the statistical and machine learning methods required to test hypotheses, make predictions, and otherwise create interpretable knowledge from this data. But what if one could automatically discover human-interpretable trends in data in an unsupervised way, and then summarize these trends in textual and/or visual form?
To help make progress in this area,
Professor Zoubin Ghahramani
and his group at the University of Cambridge received a
Google Focused Research Award
in support of
The Automatic Statistician
project, which aims to build an "artificial intelligence for data science".
So far, the project has mostly been focussing on finding trends in time series data. For example, suppose we measure the levels of solar irradiance over time, as shown in this plot:
This time series clearly exhibits several sources of variation: it is approximately periodic (with a period of about 11 years, known as the
Schwabe cycle
), but with notably low levels of activity in the late 1600s. It would be useful to automatically discover these kinds of regularities (as well as irregularities), to help further basic scientific understanding, as well as to help make more accurate forecasts in the future.
We can model such data using non-parametric statistical models based on
Gaussian processes
. Such methods require the specification of a
kernel function
which characterizes the nature of the underlying function that can accurately model the data (e.g., is it periodic? is it smooth? is it monotonic?). While the parameters of this kernel function are estimated from data, the form of the kernel itself is typically specified by hand, and relies on the knowledge and experience of a trained data scientist.
Prof Ghahramani's group has developed an
algorithm
that can automatically discover a good kernel, by searching through an open-ended space of sums and products of kernels as well as other compositional operations. After model selection and fitting, the Automatic Statistician translates each kernel into a text description describing the main trends in the data in an easy-to-understand form.
The compositional structure of the space of statistical models neatly maps onto compositionally constructed sentences allowing for the automatic description of the statistical models produced by any kernel. For example, in a product of kernels, one kernel can be mapped to a standard noun phrase (e.g. ‘a periodic function’) and the other kernels to appropriate modifiers of this noun phrase (e.g. ‘whose shape changes smoothly’, ‘with growing amplitude’). The end result is an automatically generated 5-15 page report describing the patterns in the data with figures and tables supporting the main claims. Here is an extract of the report produced by their system for the solar irradiance data:
Extract of the
report for the solar irradiance data
, automatically generated by the automatic statistician.
The Automatic Statistician
is currently being generalized to find patterns in other kinds of data, such as multidimensional regression problems, and relational databases. A web-based demo of a simplified version of the system was launched in August 2014. It allowed a user to upload a dataset, and to receive an automatically produced analysis after a few minutes. An expanded version of the service will be launched in early 2015 (we will post details when available). We believe this will have many applications for anyone interested in Data Science.
Advances in Variational Inference: Working Towards Large-scale Probabilistic Machine Learning at NIPS 2014
Monday, December 1, 2014
Posted by Shakir Mohamed and Charles Blundell, Google DeepMind, London
At Google, we continually explore and develop large-scale machine learning systems to improve our user’s experience, such as providing better video recommendations, deciding on the best language translation in a given context, or improving the accuracy of image search results. The data used to train these systems often contains many inconsistencies and missing elements, making progress towards large-scale probabilistic models designed to address these problems an important and ongoing part of our research. One principled and efficient approach for developing such models relies on an approach known as
Variational Inference
.
A renewed interest and several recent advances in variational inference
1,2,3,4,5,6
has motivated us to support and co-organise this year’s workshop on
Advances in Variational Inference
as part of the
Neural Information Processing Systems
(NIPS) conference in Montreal. These advances include new methods for scalability using
stochastic gradient methods
, the ability to handle data that arrives continuously as a
stream
, inference in non-linear
time-series models
, principled regularisation in
deep neural networks
, and inference-based decision making in
reinforcement learning
, amongst others.
Whilst variational methods have clearly emerged as a leading approach for tractable, large-scale probabilistic inference, there remain important trade-offs in speed, accuracy, simplicity and applicability between variational and other approximative schemes. The goal of the workshop will be to contextualise these developments and address some of the many unanswered questions through:
Contributed talks from 6 speakers
who are leading the resurgence of variational inference, and shaping the debate on topics of stochastic optimisation, deep learning, Bayesian non-parametrics, and theory.
34 contributed papers
covering significant advances in methodology, theory and applications including efficient optimisation, streaming data analysis, submodularity, non-parametric modelling and message passing.
A panel discussion with leading researchers
in the field that will further interrogate these ideas. Our panelists are
David Blei
,
Neil Lawrence
,
Shinichi Nakajima
and
Matthias Seeger
.
The workshop presents a fantastic opportunity to discuss the opportunities and obstacles facing the wider adoption of variational methods. The workshop will be held on the 13th December 2014 at the Montreal Convention and Exhibition Centre. For more details see:
www.variationalinference.org
.
References:
1.
Rezende, Danilo J., Shakir Mohamed, and Daan Wierstra
,
Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative Models
,
Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), 2014.
2.
Gregor, Karol, Ivo Danihelka, Andriy Mnih, Charles Blundell and Daan Wierstra
,
Deep AutoRegressive Networks
,
Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), 2014.
3.
Mnih, Andriy, and Karol Gregor,
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks
, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), 2014.
4.
Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M.,
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2014.
5.
Broderick, T., Boyd, N., Wibisono, A., Wilson, A. C., & Jordan, M.
,
Streaming Variational Bayes
,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1727-1735), 2013.
6.
Hoffman, M., Blei, D. M., Wang, C., and Paisley, J.,
Stochastic Variational Inference
, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14:1303–1347, 2013.
Labels
accessibility
ACL
ACM
Acoustic Modeling
Adaptive Data Analysis
ads
adsense
adwords
Africa
AI
AI for Social Good
Algorithms
Android
Android Wear
API
App Engine
App Inventor
April Fools
Art
Audio
Augmented Reality
Australia
Automatic Speech Recognition
AutoML
Awards
BigQuery
Cantonese
Chemistry
China
Chrome
Cloud Computing
Collaboration
Compression
Computational Imaging
Computational Photography
Computer Science
Computer Vision
conference
conferences
Conservation
correlate
Course Builder
crowd-sourcing
CVPR
Data Center
Data Discovery
data science
datasets
Deep Learning
DeepDream
DeepMind
distributed systems
Diversity
Earth Engine
economics
Education
Electronic Commerce and Algorithms
electronics
EMEA
EMNLP
Encryption
entities
Entity Salience
Environment
Europe
Exacycle
Expander
Faculty Institute
Faculty Summit
Flu Trends
Fusion Tables
gamification
Gboard
Gmail
Google Accelerated Science
Google Books
Google Brain
Google Cloud Platform
Google Docs
Google Drive
Google Genomics
Google Maps
Google Photos
Google Play Apps
Google Science Fair
Google Sheets
Google Translate
Google Trips
Google Voice Search
Google+
Government
grants
Graph
Graph Mining
Hardware
HCI
Health
High Dynamic Range Imaging
ICCV
ICLR
ICML
ICSE
Image Annotation
Image Classification
Image Processing
Inbox
India
Information Retrieval
internationalization
Internet of Things
Interspeech
IPython
Journalism
jsm
jsm2011
K-12
Kaggle
KDD
Keyboard Input
Klingon
Korean
Labs
Linear Optimization
localization
Low-Light Photography
Machine Hearing
Machine Intelligence
Machine Learning
Machine Perception
Machine Translation
Magenta
MapReduce
market algorithms
Market Research
Mixed Reality
ML
ML Fairness
MOOC
Moore's Law
Multimodal Learning
NAACL
Natural Language Processing
Natural Language Understanding
Network Management
Networks
Neural Networks
NeurIPS
Nexus
Ngram
NIPS
NLP
On-device Learning
open source
operating systems
Optical Character Recognition
optimization
osdi
osdi10
patents
Peer Review
ph.d. fellowship
PhD Fellowship
PhotoScan
Physics
PiLab
Pixel
Policy
Professional Development
Proposals
Public Data Explorer
publication
Publications
Quantum AI
Quantum Computing
Recommender Systems
Reinforcement Learning
renewable energy
Research
Research Awards
resource optimization
Robotics
schema.org
Search
search ads
Security and Privacy
Self-Supervised Learning
Semantic Models
Semi-supervised Learning
SIGCOMM
SIGMOD
Site Reliability Engineering
Social Networks
Software
Sound Search
Speech
Speech Recognition
statistics
Structured Data
Style Transfer
Supervised Learning
Systems
TensorBoard
TensorFlow
TPU
Translate
trends
TTS
TV
UI
University Relations
UNIX
Unsupervised Learning
User Experience
video
Video Analysis
Virtual Reality
Vision Research
Visiting Faculty
Visualization
VLDB
Voice Search
Wiki
wikipedia
WWW
Year in Review
YouTube
Archive
2020
Mar
Feb
Jan
2019
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2018
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2017
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2016
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2015
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2014
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2013
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2012
Dec
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2011
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2010
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2009
Dec
Nov
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Jul
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
2007
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Feb
2006
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Apr
Mar
Feb
Feed
Follow @googleai
Give us feedback in our
Product Forums
.
