Blog
The latest from Google Research
Announcing the YouTube-8M Segments Dataset
Friday, June 28, 2019
Posted by Joonseok Lee and Joe Yue-Hei Ng, Software Engineers, Google Research
Over the last two years, the
First
and
Second YouTube-8M Large-Scale Video Understanding Challenge and Workshop
have collectively drawn 1000+ teams from 60+ countries to further advance large-scale video understanding research. While these events have enabled great progress in video classification, the YouTube dataset on which they were based only used machine-generated video-level labels, and lacked fine-grained temporally localized information, which limited the ability of machine learning models to predict video content.
To accelerate the research of temporal concept localization, we are excited to announce the release of
YouTube-8M Segments
, a new extension of the YouTube-8M dataset that includes human-verified labels at the 5-second segment level on a subset of YouTube-8M videos. With the additional temporal annotations, YouTube-8M is now both a large-scale classification dataset as well as a temporal localization dataset. In addition, we are hosting another
Kaggle video understanding challenge
focused on temporal localization, as well as an affiliated
3rd Workshop on YouTube-8M Large-Scale Video Understanding
at the
2019 International Conference on Computer Vision
(ICCV’19).
YouTube-8M Segments
Video segment labels provide a valuable resource for temporal localization not possible with video-level labels, and enable novel applications, such as
capturing special video moments
. Instead of exhaustively labeling all segments in a video, to create the YouTube-8M Segments extension, we manually labeled 5 segments (on average) per randomly selected video on the YouTube-8M validation dataset, totalling ~237k segments covering 1000 categories.
This dataset, combined with the previous
YouTube-8M release
containing a very large number of machine generated video-level labels, should allow learning temporal localization models in novel ways. Evaluating such classifiers is of course very challenging if only noisy video-level labels are available. We hope that the newly added human-labeled annotations will help ensure that researchers can more accurately evaluate their algorithms.
The 3rd YouTube-8M Video Understanding Challenge
This year the YouTube-8M Video Understanding Challenge focuses on temporal localization. Participants are encouraged to leverage noisy video-level labels together with a small segment-level validation set in order to better annotate and temporally localize concepts of interest. Unlike last year, there is no model size restriction. Each of the top 10 teams will be awarded $2,500 to support their travel to Seoul to attend ICCV’19. For details, please visit the
Kaggle competition page
.
The 3rd Workshop on YouTube-8M Large-Scale Video Understanding
Continuing in the tradition of the previous two years, the 3rd workshop will feature four invited talks by distinguished researchers as well as presentations by top-performing challenge participants. We encourage those who wish to attend to submit papers describing their research, experiments, or applications based on the YouTube-8M dataset, including papers summarizing their participation in the challenge above. Please refer to the
workshop page
for more details.
It is our hope that this newest extension will serve as a unique playground for temporal localization that mimics real world scenarios. We also look forward to the new challenge and workshop, which we believe will continue to advance research in large-scale video understanding. We hope you will join us again!
Acknowledgements
This post reflects the work of many machine perception researchers including Ke Chen, Nisarg Kothari, Joonseok Lee, Hanhan Li, Paul Natsev, Joe Yue-Hei Ng, Naderi Parizi, David Ross, Cordelia Schmid, Javier Snaider, Rahul Sukthankar, George Toderici, Balakrishnan Varadarajan, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Yexin Wang, Zheng Xu, as well as Julia Elliott and Walter Reade from Kaggle. We are also grateful for the support and advice from our partners at YouTube.
Predicting Bus Delays with Machine Learning
Thursday, June 27, 2019
Posted by Alex Fabrikant, Research Scientist, Google Research
Hundreds of millions of people across the world rely on public transit for their daily commute, and over half of the world's transit trips involve buses. As the world's cities continue growing, commuters want to know when to expect delays, especially for bus rides, which are prone to getting held up by traffic. While public transit directions provided by Google Maps are informed by many transit agencies that provide real-time data, there are many agencies that can’t provide them due to technical and resource constraints.
Today, Google Maps
introduced live traffic delays for buses
, forecasting bus delays in hundreds of cities world-wide, ranging from Atlanta to Zagreb to Istanbul to Manila and more. This improves the accuracy of transit timing for over sixty million people. This system,
first launched in India three weeks ago
, is driven by a machine learning model that combines real-time car traffic forecasts with data on bus routes and stops to better predict how long a bus trip will take.
The Beginnings of a Model
In the many cities without real-time forecasts from the transit agency, we heard from surveyed users that they employed a clever workaround to roughly estimate bus delays: using Google Maps driving directions. But buses are not just large cars. They stop at bus stops; take longer to accelerate, slow down, and turn; and sometimes even have special road privileges, like bus-only lanes.
As an example, let’s examine a Wednesday afternoon bus ride in Sydney. The actual motion of the bus (blue) is running a few minutes behind the published schedule (black). Car traffic speeds (red) do affect the bus, such as the slowdown at 2000 meters, but a long stop at the 800 meter mark slows the bus down significantly compared to a car.
To develop our model, we extracted training data from sequences of bus positions over time, as received from transit agencies’ real time feeds, and aligned them to car traffic speeds on the bus's path during the trip. The model is split into a sequence of timeline units—visits to street blocks and stops—each corresponding to a piece of the bus's timeline, with each unit forecasting a duration. A pair of adjacent observations usually spans many units, due to infrequent reporting, fast-moving buses, and short blocks and stops.
This structure is well suited for neural sequence models like those that have recently been successfully applied to
speech processing
,
machine translation
, etc. Our model is simpler. Each unit predicts its duration independently, and the final output is the sum of the per-unit forecasts. Unlike many sequence models, our model does not need to learn to combine unit outputs, nor to pass state through the unit sequence. Instead, the sequence structure lets us jointly (1) train models of individual units' durations and (2) optimize the "linear system" where each observed trajectory assigns a total duration to the sum of the many units it spans.
To model a bus trip (a) starting at the blue stop, the model (b) adds up the delay predictions from timeline units for the blue stop, the three road segments, the white stop, etc.
Modeling the "Where"
In addition to road traffic delays, in training our model we also take into account details about the bus route, as well as signals about the trip's location and timing. Even within a small neighborhood, the model needs to translate car speed predictions into bus speeds differently on different streets. In the left panel below, we color-code our model's predicted ratio between car speeds and bus speeds for a bus trip. Redder, slower parts may correspond to bus deceleration near stops. As for the fast green stretch in the highlighted box, we learn from looking at it in StreetView (right) that our model discovered a bus-only turn lane. By the way, this route is in Australia, where right turns are slower than left, another aspect that would be lost on a model that doesn’t consider peculiarities of location.
To capture unique properties of specific streets, neighborhoods, and cities, we let the model learn a hierarchy of representations for areas of different size, with a timeline unit's geography (the precise location of a road or a stop) represented in the model by the sum of the embeddings of its location at various scales. We first train the model with progressively heavier penalties for finer-grain locations with special cases, and use the results for feature selection. This ensures that fine-grained features in areas complex enough where a hundred meters affects bus behavior are taken into account, as opposed to open countryside where such fine-grained features seldom matter.
At training time, we also simulate the possibility of later queries about areas that were not in the training data. In each training batch, we take a random slice of examples and discard geographic features below a scale randomly selected for each. Some examples are kept with the exact bus route and street, others keep only neighborhood- or city-level locations, and others yet have no geographical context at all. This better prepares the model for later queries about areas where we were short on training data. We expand the coverage of our training corpus by using anonymized inferences about user bus trips from the same dataset that Google Maps uses for
popular times at businesses
,
parking difficulty
, and other features. However, even this data does not include the majority of the world's bus routes, so our models must generalize robustly to new areas.
Learning the Local Rhythms
Different cities and neighborhoods also run to a different beat, so we allow the model to combine its representation of location with time signals. Buses have a complex dependence on time — the difference between 6:30pm and 6:45pm on a Tuesday might be the wind-down of rush hour in some neighborhoods, a busy dining time in others, and entirely quiet in a sleepy town elsewhere. Our model learns an embedding of the local time of day and day of week signals, which, when combined with the location representation, captures salient local variations, like rush hour bus stop crowds, that aren't observed via car traffic.
This embedding assigns 4-dimensional vectors to times of the day. Unlike most neural net internals, four dimensions is almost few enough to visualize, so let's peek at how the model arranges times of day in three of those dimensions, via the artistic rendering below. The model indeed learns that time is cyclical, placing time in a "loop". But this loop is not just the flat circle of a clock's face. The model learns wide bends that let other neurons compose simple rules to easily separate away concepts like "middle of the night" or "late morning" that don't feature much bus behavior variation. On the other hand, evening commute patterns differ much more among neighborhoods and cities, and the model appears to create more complex "crumpled" patterns between 4pm-9pm that enable more intricate inferences about the timings of each city's rush hour.
The model's time representation (3 out of 4 dimensions) forms a loop, reimagined here as the circumference of a watch. The more location-dependent time windows like 4pm-9pm and 7am-9am get more complex "crumpling", while big featureless windows like 2am-5am get bent away with flat bends for simpler rules. (Artist's conception by Will Cassella, using textures from textures.com and HDRIs from hdrihaven.)
Together with other signals, this time representation lets us predict complex patterns even if we hold car speeds constant. On a 10km bus ride through New Jersey, for example, our model picks up on lunchtime crowds and weekday rush hours:
Putting it All Together
With the model fully trained, let's take a look at what it learned about the Sydney bus ride above. If we run the model on that day's car traffic data, it gives us the green predictions below. It doesn't catch everything. For instance, it has the stop at 800 meters lasting only 10 seconds, though the bus stopped for at least 31 sec. But we stay within 1.5 minutes of the real bus motion, catching a lot more of the trip's nuances than the schedule or car driving times alone would give us.
The Trip Ahead
One thing not in our model for now? The bus schedule itself. So far, in experiments with official agency bus schedules, they haven't improved our forecasts significantly. In some cities, severe traffic fluctuations might overwhelm attempts to plan a schedule. In others, the bus schedules might be precise, but perhaps because transit agencies carefully account for traffic patterns. And we infer those from the data.
We continue to experiment with making better use of schedule constraints and many other signals to drive more precise forecasting and make it easier for our users to plan their trips. We hope we'll be of use to you on your way, too. Happy travels!
Acknowledgements
This work was the joint effort of James Cook, Alex Fabrikant, Ivan Kuznetsov, and Fangzhou Xu, on Google Research, and Anthony Bertuca, Julian Gibbons, Thierry Le Boulengé, Cayden Meyer, Anatoli Plotnikov, and Ivan Volosyuk on Google Maps. We thank Senaka Buthpitiya, Da-Cheng Juan, Reuben Kan, Ramesh Nagarajan, Andrew Tomkins, and the greater Transit team for support and helpful discussions; as well as Will Cassella for the inspired reimagining of the model's time embedding. We are also indebted to our partner agencies for providing the transit data feeds the system is trained on.
Innovations in Graph Representation Learning
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
Posted by Alessandro Epasto, Senior Research Scientist and Bryan Perozzi, Senior Research Scientist, Graph Mining Team
Relational data representing relationships between entities is ubiquitous on the Web (e.g., online social networks) and in the physical world (e.g., in protein interaction networks). Such data can be represented as a
graph
with
nodes
(e.g., users, proteins), and
edges
connecting them (e.g.,
friendship relations
, protein interactions). Given the widespread prevalence of graphs,
graph analysis
plays a fundamental role in machine learning, with applications in
clustering
,
link prediction
,
privacy
, and
others
. To apply machine learning methods to graphs (e.g., predicting new friendships, or discovering unknown protein interactions) one needs to
learn
a representation of the graph that is amenable to be used in ML algorithms
.
However, graphs are inherently combinatorial structures made of discrete parts like nodes and edges, while many common ML methods, like neural networks, favor continuous structures, in particular vector representations.
Vector representations are particularly important in neural networks, as they can be directly used as input layers. To get around the difficulties in using discrete graph representations in ML,
graph embedding
methods learn a continuous vector space for the graph, assigning each node (and/or edge) in the graph to a specific position in a vector space. A popular approach in this area is that of random-walk-based representation learning, as introduced in
DeepWalk
.
Left:
The well-known
Karate
graph representing a social network.
Right:
A continuous space embedding of the nodes in the graph using
DeepWalk
.
Here we present the results of two recent papers on graph embedding: “
Is a Single Embedding Enough? Learning Node Representations that Capture Multiple Social Contexts
” presented at
WWW’19
and “
Watch Your Step: Learning Node Embeddings via Graph Attention
” at
NeurIPS’18
. The first paper introduces a novel technique to learn multiple embeddings per node, enabling a better characterization of networks with overlapping communities. The second addresses the fundamental problem of hyperparameter tuning in graph embeddings, allowing one to easily deploy graph embeddings methods with less effort. We are also happy to announce that we have released the code for both papers in the Google Research github repository for
graph embeddings
.
Learning Node Representations that Capture Multiple Social Contexts
In virtually all cases, the crucial assumption of standard graph embedding methods is that a
single
embedding has to be learned for each node. Thus, the embedding method can be said to seek to identify the
single
role or position that characterizes each node in the geometry of the graph. Recent work observed, however, that nodes in real networks belong to multiple
overlapping
communities and play
multiple
roles—think about your social network where you participate in both your family and in your work community. This observation motivates the following research question: is it possible to develop methods where nodes are embedded in multiple vectors, representing their participation in overlapping communities?
In our
WWW’19 paper
, we developed
Splitter
, an unsupervised embedding method that allows the nodes in a graph to have multiple embeddings to better encode their participation in multiple communities. Our method is based on recent innovations in overlapping clustering based on
ego-network analysis
, using the
persona graph concept
, in particular. This method takes a graph
G
, and creates a new graph
P
(called the
persona graph
), where each node in
G
is represented by a series of replicas called the
persona
nodes. Each persona of a node represents an instantiation of the node in a local community to which it belongs. For each node U in the graph, we analyze the ego-network of the node (i.e., the graph connecting the node to its neighbors, in this example A, B, C, D) to discover local communities to which the node belongs. For instance, in the figure below, node U belongs to two communities: Cluster 1 (with the friends A and B, say U’s family members) and Cluster 2 (with C and D, say U’s colleagues).
Ego-net of node U
Then, we use this information to “split” node U into its two
personas
U1 (the family persona) and U2 (the work persona). This disentangles the two communities, so that they no longer overlap.
The ego-splitting method separating the U nodes in 2 personas.
This technique has been used to improve the state-of-the-art results in graph embedding methods, showing
up to 90% reduction
in link prediction (i.e., predicting which link will form in the future) error on a variety of graphs. The key reason for this improvement is the ability of the method to disambiguate highly overlapping communities found in social networks and other real-world graphs. We further validate this result with an in-depth analysis of co-authorship graphs where authors belong to overlapping research communities (e.g., machine learning and data mining).
Top Left:
A typical graphs with highly overlapping communities.
Top Right:
A traditional embedding of the graph on the left using
node2vec
.
Bottom Left:
A persona graph of the graph above.
Bottom Right:
The
Splitter
embedding of the persona graph. Notice how the persona graph clearly disentangles the overlapping communities of the original graph and
Splitter
outputs well-separated embeddings.
Automatic hyper-parameter tuning via graph attention.
Graph embedding methods have shown outstanding performance on various ML-based applications, such as
link prediction and node classification
, but they have a number of hyper-parameters that must be manually set. For example, are nearby nodes more important to capture when learning embeddings than nodes that are further away? Even though experts may be able to fine tune these hyper-parameters, one must do so independently for each graph. To obviate such manual work, in our
second paper
, we proposed a method to learn the optimal hyper-parameters automatically
.
Specifically, many graph embedding methods, like
DeepWalk
, employ random walks to explore the context around a given node (i.e. the direct neighbors, the neighbors of the neighbors, etc). Such random walks can have many hyper-parameters that allow tuning of the local exploration of the graph, thus regulating the attention given by the embeddings to nearby nodes. Different graphs may present different optimal attention patterns and hence different optimal hyperparameters (see the picture below, where we show two different attention distributions). Watch Your Step formulates a model for the performance of the embedding methods based on the above mentioned hyper-parameters. Then we optimize the hyper-parameters to maximize the performance predicted by the model, using standard
backpropagation
. We found that the values learned by backpropagation agree with the optimal hyper-parameters obtained by grid search.
Our new method for automatic hyper-parameter tuning, Watch Your Step, uses an attention model to learn different graph context distributions. Shown above are two example local neighborhoods about a center node (in yellow) and the context distributions (red gradient) that was learned by the model. The left-side graph shows a more diffused attention model, while the distribution on the right shows one concentrated on direct neighbors.
This work falls under the growing family of
AutoML
, where we want to alleviate the burden of optimizing the hyperparameters—a common problem in practical machine learning. Many AutoML methods use
neural architecture search
. This paper instead shows a variant, where we use the mathematical connection between the hyperparameters in the embeddings and graph-theoretic matrix formulations. The “Auto” portion corresponds to learning the graph hyperparameters by backpropagation.
We believe that our contributions will further advance the state of the research in graph embedding in various directions. Our method for learning multiple node embeddings draws a connection between the rich and well-studied field of overlapping community detection, and the more recent one of graph embedding which we believe may result in fruitful future research. An open problem in this area is the use of multiple-embedding methods for classification. Furthermore, our contribution on learning hyperparameters will foster graph embedding adoption by reducing the need for expensive manual tuning. We hope the release of these papers and
code
will help the research community pursue these directions.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sami Abu-el-Haija who contributed to this work and is now a Ph.D. student at USC. For more information on the
Graph Mining team
(part of
Algorithm and Optimization
), visit our pages.
Off-Policy Classification - A New Reinforcement Learning Model Selection Method
Wednesday, June 19, 2019
Posted by Alex Irpan, Software Engineer, Robotics at Google
Reinforcement learning
(RL) is a framework that lets agents learn decision making from experience. One of the many variants of RL is
off-policy RL
, where an agent is trained using a combination of data collected by other agents (off-policy data) and data it collects itself to learn generalizable skills like robotic
walking
and
grasping
. In contrast,
fully off-policy RL
is a variant in which an agent learns
entirely
from older data, which is appealing because it enables model iteration without requiring a physical robot. With fully off-policy RL, one can train several models on the same fixed dataset collected by previous agents, then select the best one. However, fully off-policy RL comes with a catch: while
training
can occur without a real robot,
evaluation
of the models cannot. Furthermore, ground-truth evaluation with a physical robot is too inefficient to test promising approaches that require evaluating a large number of models, such as automated architecture search with
AutoML
.
This challenge motivates o
ff-policy evaluation
(OPE), techniques for studying the quality of new agents using data from other agents. With rankings from OPE, we can selectively test only the most promising models on real-world robots, significantly scaling experimentation with the same fixed real robot budget.
A diagram for real-world model development. Assuming we can evaluate 10 models per day, without off-policy evaluation, we would need 100x as many days to evaluate our models.
Though the OPE framework shows promise, it assumes one has an off-policy evaluation method that accurately ranks performance from old data. However, agents that collected past experience may act very differently from newer learned agents, which makes it hard to get good estimates of performance.
In “
Off-Policy Evaluation via Off-Policy Classification
”, we propose a new off-policy evaluation method, called
off-policy classification
(OPC), that evaluates the performance of agents from past data by treating evaluation as a classification problem, in which actions are labeled as either potentially leading to success or guaranteed to result in failure. Our method works for image (camera) inputs, and doesn’t require reweighting data with
importance sampling
or using accurate models of the target environment, two approaches commonly used in prior work. We show that OPC scales to larger tasks, including a vision-based robotic grasping task in the real world.
How OPC Works
OPC relies on two assumptions: 1) that the final task has deterministic dynamics, i.e. no randomness is involved in how states change, and 2) that the agent either succeeds or fails at the end of each trial. This second “success or failure” assumption is natural for many tasks, such as picking up an object, solving a maze, winning a game, and so on. Because each trial will either succeed or fail in a deterministic way, we can assign binary classification labels to each action. We say an action is
effective
if it could lead to success, and is
catastrophic
if it is guaranteed to lead to failure.
OPC utilizes a
Q-function
, learned with a
Q-learning
algorithm, that estimates the future total reward if the agent chooses to take some action from its current state. The agent will then choose the action with the largest total reward estimate. In our paper, we prove that the performance of an agent is measured by how often its chosen action is an effective action, which depends on how well the Q-function correctly classifies actions as effective vs. catastrophic. This classification accuracy acts as an off-policy evaluation score.
However, the labeling of data from previous trials is only partial. For example, if a previous trial was a failure, we do not get negative labels because we do not know which action was the catastrophic one. To overcome this, we leverage techniques from semi-supervised learning,
positive-unlabeled learning
in particular, to get an estimate of classification accuracy from partially labeled data. This accuracy is the OPC score.
Off-Policy Evaluation for Sim-to-Real Learning
In robotics, it’s common to use
simulated data
and
transfer learning techniques
to reduce the
sample complexity
of learning robotics skills. This can be very useful, but tuning these sim-to-real techniques for real-world robotics is challenging. Much like off-policy RL, training doesn’t use the real robot, because it is trained in simulation, but evaluation of that policy still needs to use a real robot. Here, off-policy evaluation can come to the rescue again—we can take a policy trained only in simulation, then evaluate it using previous real-world data to measure its transfer to the real robot. We examine OPC across both fully off-policy RL and sim-to-real RL.
An example of how simulated experience can differ from real-world experience. Here, simulated images (
left
) have much less visual complexity than real-world images (
right
).
Results
First, we set up a simulated version of our robot grasping task, where we could easily train and evaluate several models to benchmark off-policy evaluation. These models were trained with fully off-policy RL, then evaluated with off-policy evaluation. We found that in our robotics tasks, a variant of the OPC called the SoftOPC performed best at predicting final success rate.
An experiment in the simulated grasping task. The red curve is the dimensionless SoftOPC score over the course of training, evaluated from old data. The blue curve is the grasp success rate in simulation. We see the SoftOPC on old data correlates well with grasp success of the model within our simulator.
After success in sim, we then tried SoftOPC in the real-world task. We took 15 models, trained to have varying degrees of robustness to the gap between simulation and reality. Of these models, 7 of them were trained purely in simulation, and the rest were trained on mixes of simulated and real-world data. For each model, we evaluated the SoftOPC on off-policy real-world data, then the real-world grasp success, to see how well SoftOPC predicted performance of that model. We found that on real data, the SoftOPC does produce scores that correlate with true grasp success, letting us rank sim-to-real techniques using past real experience.
SoftOPC score and true performance for 3 different sim-to-real methods: a baseline simulation, a simulation with
random textures and lighting
, and a model trained with
RCAN
. All three models are trained with no real data, then evaluated with off-policy evaluation on a validation set of real data. The ordering of the SoftOPC score matches the order of real grasp success.
Below is a scatterplot of the full results from all 15 models. Each point represents the off-policy evaluation score and real-world grasp success of each model. We compare different scoring functions by their correlation to final grasp success. The SoftOPC does not correlate perfectly with true grasp success, but its scores are significantly more reliable than baseline approaches like the
temporal-difference error
(the standard Q-learning loss).
Results from our sim-to-real evaluation experiment. On the left is a baseline, the
temporal difference
error of the model. On the right is one of our proposed methods, the SoftOPC. The shaded region is a 95% confidence interval. The correlation is significantly better with SoftOPC.
Future Work
One promising direction for future work is to see if we can relax our assumptions about the task, to support tasks where dynamics are more noisy, or where we get partial credit for almost succeeding. However, even with our included assumptions, we think the results are promising enough to be applied to many real-world RL problems.
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted by Alex Irpan, Kanishka Rao, Konstantinos Bousmalis, Chris Harris, Julian Ibarz and Sergey Levine. We’d like to thank Razvan Pascanu, Dale Schuurmans, George Tucker and Paul Wohlhart for valuable discussions. A preprint is available on
arXiv
.
Google at CVPR 2019
Monday, June 17, 2019
Posted by
Andrew Helton, Editor, Google AI Communications
This week, Long Beach, CA hosts the
2019 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(CVPR 2019), the premier annual computer vision event comprising the main conference and several co-located
workshops
and
tutorials
. As a leader in computer vision research and a Platinum Sponsor, Google will have a strong presence at CVPR 2019—over 250 Googlers will be in attendance to present papers and invited talks at the conference, and to organize and participate in multiple workshops.
If you are attending CVPR this year, please stop by our booth and chat with our researchers who are actively pursuing the next generation of intelligent systems that utilize the latest machine learning techniques applied to various areas of
machine perception
. Our researchers will also be available to talk about and demo several recent efforts, including the technology behind
predicting pedestrian motion
, the
Open Images V5 dataset
and much more.
You can learn more about our research being presented at CVPR 2019 in the list below (Google affiliations highlighted in
blue
)
Area Chairs
include:
Jonathan T. Barron
,
William T. Freeman
,
Ce Liu
,
Michael Ryoo
,
Noah Snavely
Oral Presentations
Relational Action Forecasting
Chen Sun
, Abhinav Shrivastava,
Carl Vondrick
,
Rahul Sukthankar
,
Kevin Murphy
,
Cordelia Schmid
Pushing the Boundaries of View Extrapolation With Multiplane Images
Pratul P. Srinivasan,
Richard Tucker
,
Jonathan T. Barron
, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Ren Ng,
Noah Snavely
Auto-DeepLab: Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chenxi Liu,
Liang-Chieh Chen
,
Florian Schroff
,
Hartwig Adam
,
Wei Hua
, Alan L. Yuille, Li Fei-Fei
AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data
Ekin D. Cubuk
,
Barret Zoph
, Dandelion Mane,
Vijay Vasudevan
,
Quoc V. Le
DeepView: View Synthesis With Learned Gradient Descent
John Flynn
,
Michael Broxton
,
Paul Debevec
,
Matthew DuVall
,
Graham Fyffe
,
Ryan Overbeck
,
Noah Snavely
,
Richard Tucker
Normalized Object Coordinate Space for Category-Level 6D Object Pose and Size Estimation
He Wang, Srinath Sridhar, Jingwei Huang,
Julien Valentin
, Shuran Song, Leonidas J. Guibas
Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?
Simon Kornblith
,
Jonathon Shlens
,
Quoc V. Le
TextureNet: Consistent Local Parametrizations for Learning From High-Resolution Signals on Meshes
Jingwei Huang, Haotian Zhang, Li Yi,
Thomas Funkhouser
, Matthias Niessner, Leonidas J. Guibas
Diverse Generation for Multi-Agent Sports Games
Raymond A. Yeh, Alexander G. Schwing,
Jonathan Huang
,
Kevin Murphy
Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Space
Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, Michael Niemeyer,
Sebastian Nowozin
, Andreas Geiger
A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Function
Jonathan T. Barron
Learning the Depths of Moving People by Watching Frozen People
Zhengqi Li,
Tali Dekel
,
Forrester Cole
,
Richard Tucker
,
Noah Snavely
,
Ce Liu
,
William T. Freeman
(CVPR 2019 Best Paper Honorable Mention)
Composing Text and Image for Image Retrieval - an Empirical Odyssey
Nam Vo,
Lu Jiang
,
Chen Sun
,
Kevin Murphy
,
Li-Jia Li
,
Li Fei-Fei
, James Hays
Learning to Synthesize Motion Blur
Tim Brooks
,
Jonathan T. Barron
Neural Rerendering in the Wild
Moustafa Meshry,
Dan B. Goldman
,
Sameh Khamis
,
Hugues Hoppe
,
Rohit Pandey
,
Noah Snavely
,
Ricardo Martin-Brualla
Neural Illumination: Lighting Prediction for Indoor Environments
Shuran Song,
Thomas Funkhouser
Unprocessing Images for Learned Raw Denoising
Tim Brooks
, Ben Mildenhall,
Tianfan Xue
,
Jiawen Chen
,
Dillon Sharlet
,
Jonathan T. Barron
Posters
Co-Occurrent Features in Semantic Segmentation
Hang Zhang,
Han Zhang
, Chenguang Wang, Junyuan Xie
CrDoCo: Pixel-Level Domain Transfer With Cross-Domain Consistency
Yun-Chun Chen, Yen-Yu Lin,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
, Jia-Bin Huang
Im2Pencil: Controllable Pencil Illustration From Photographs
Yijun Li, Chen Fang, Aaron Hertzmann, Eli Shechtman,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Mode Seeking Generative Adversarial Networks for Diverse Image Synthesis
Qi Mao, Hsin-Ying Lee, Hung-Yu Tseng, Siwei Ma,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learning
Alexander Kolesnikov
,
Xiaohua Zhai
,
Lucas Beyer
Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image Reconstruction
Jiuxiang Gu, Handong Zhao, Zhe Lin, Sheng Li, Jianfei Cai,
Mingyang Ling
Scene Memory Transformer for Embodied Agents in Long-Horizon Tasks
Kuan Fang,
Alexander Toshev
, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese
Spatially Variant Linear Representation Models for Joint Filtering
Jinshan Pan, Jiangxin Dong, Jimmy S. Ren, Liang Lin, Jinhui Tang,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Target-Aware Deep Tracking
Xin Li, Chao Ma, Baoyuan Wu, Zhenyu He,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Temporal Cycle-Consistency Learning
Debidatta Dwibedi
, Yusuf Aytar,
Jonathan Tompson
,
Pierre Sermanet
, Andrew Zisserman
Depth-Aware Video Frame Interpolation
Wenbo Bao, Wei-Sheng Lai, Chao Ma, Xiaoyun Zhang, Zhiyong Gao,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile
Mingxing Tan
,
Bo Chen
,
Ruoming Pang
,
Vijay Vasudevan
,
Mark Sandler
,
Andrew Howard
,
Quoc V. Le
A Compact Embedding for Facial Expression Similarity
Raviteja Vemulapalli
,
Aseem Agarwala
Contrastive Adaptation Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Guoliang Kang,
Lu Jiang
, Yi Yang, Alexander G. Hauptmann
DeepLight: Learning Illumination for Unconstrained Mobile Mixed Reality
Chloe LeGendre,
Wan-Chun Ma
,
Graham Fyffe
,
John Flynn
,
Laurent Charbonnel
,
Jay Busch
,
Paul Debevec
Detect-To-Retrieve: Efficient Regional Aggregation for Image Search
Marvin Teichmann,
Andre Araujo
,
Menglong Zhu
,
Jack Sim
Fast Object Class Labelling via Speech
Michael Gygli
,
Vittorio Ferrari
Learning Independent Object Motion From Unlabelled Stereoscopic Videos
Zhe Cao, Abhishek Kar,
Christian Hane
, Jitendra Malik
Peeking Into the Future: Predicting Future Person Activities and Locations in Videos
Junwei Liang,
Lu Jiang
,
Juan Carlos Niebles
, Alexander G. Hauptmann,
Li Fei-Fei
SpotTune: Transfer Learning Through Adaptive Fine-Tuning
Yunhui Guo, Honghui Shi,
Abhishek Kumar
, Kristen Grauman, Tajana Rosing, Rogerio Feris
NAS-FPN: Learning Scalable Feature Pyramid Architecture for Object Detection
Golnaz Ghiasi
,
Tsung-Yi Lin
,
Quoc V. Le
Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samples
Yin Cui, Menglin Jia,
Tsung-Yi Lin
, Yang Song, Serge Belongie
FEELVOS: Fast End-To-End Embedding Learning for Video Object Segmentation
Paul Voigtlaender, Yuning Chai,
Florian Schroff
,
Hartwig Adam
, Bastian Leibe,
Liang-Chieh Chen
Inserting Videos Into Videos
Donghoon Lee,
Tomas Pfister
,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Volumetric Capture of Humans With a Single RGBD Camera via Semi-Parametric Learning
Rohit Pandey
,
Anastasia Tkach
,
Shuoran Yang
,
Pavel Pidlypenskyi
,
Jonathan Taylor
,
Ricardo Martin-Brualla
,
Andrea Tagliasacchi
, George Papandreou,
Philip Davidson
,
Cem Keskin
,
Shahram Izadi
,
Sean Fanello
You Look Twice: GaterNet for Dynamic Filter Selection in CNNs
Zhourong Chen,
Yang Li
,
Samy Bengio
,
Si Si
Interactive Full Image Segmentation by Considering All Regions Jointly
Eirikur Agustsson
,
Jasper R. R. Uijlings
,
Vittorio Ferrari
Large-Scale Interactive Object Segmentation With Human Annotators
Rodrigo Benenson
,
Stefan Popov
,
Vittorio Ferrari
Self-Supervised GANs via Auxiliary Rotation Loss
Ting Chen,
Xiaohua Zhai
,
Marvin Ritter
,
Mario Lučić
,
Neil Houlsby
Sim-To-Real via Sim-To-Sim: Data-Efficient Robotic Grasping via Randomized-To-Canonical Adaptation Networks
Stephen James, Paul Wohlhart, Mrinal Kalakrishnan,
Dmitry Kalashnikov
,
Alex Irpan
,
Julian Ibarz
,
Sergey Levine
, Raia Hadsell, Konstantinos Bousmalis
Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden Scenes
Adam B. Yedidia, Manel Baradad, Christos Thrampoulidis,
William T. Freeman
, Gregory W. Wornell
Workshops
Computer Vision for Global Challenges
Organizers include:
Timnit Gebru
,
Ernest Mwebaze
,
John Quinn
Deep Vision 2019
Invited speakers include:
Pierre Sermanet
,
Chris Bregler
Landmark Recognition
Organizers include:
Andre Araujo
,
Bingyi Cao
,
Jack Sim
,
Tobias Weyand
Image Matching: Local Features and Beyond
Organizers include:
Eduard Trulls
3D-WiDGET: Deep GEneraTive Models for 3D Understanding
Invited speakers include:
Julien Valentin
Fine-Grained Visual Categorization
Organizers include:
Christine Kaeser-Chen
Advisory panel includes:
Hartwig Adam
Low-Power Image Recognition Challenge (LPIRC)
Organizers include:
Aakanksha Chowdhery
,
Achille Brighton
,
Alec Go
,
Andrew Howard
,
Bo Chen
,
Jaeyoun Kim
,
Jeff Gilbert
New Trends in Image Restoration and Enhancement Workshop and Associated Challenges
Program chairs include:
Vivek Kwatra
,
Peyman Milanfar
,
Sebastian Nowozin
,
George Toderici
,
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Spatio-temporal Action Recognition (AVA) @ ActivityNet Challenge
Organizers include:
David Ross
,
Sourish Chaudhuri
,
Radhika Marvin
,
Arkadiusz Stopczynski
,
Joseph Roth
,
Caroline Pantofaru
,
Chen Sun
,
Cordelia Schmid
Third Workshop on Computer Vision for AR/VR
Organizers include:
Sofien Bouaziz
,
Serge Belongie
DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentation
Organizers include:
Jordi Pont-Tuset
,
Alberto Montes
Efficient Deep Learning for Computer Vision
Invited speakers include:
Andrew Howard
Fairness Accountability Transparency and Ethics in Computer Vision
Organizers include:
Timnit Gebru
,
Margaret Mitchell
Precognition Seeing through the Future
Organizers include:
Utsav Prabhu
Workshop and Challenge on Learned Image Compression
Organizers include:
George Toderici
,
Michele Covell
,
Johannes Ballé
,
Eirikur Agustsson
,
Nick Johnston
When Blockchain Meets Computer Vision & AI
Invited speakers include:
Chris Bregler
Applications of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition to Media Forensics
Organizers include:
Paul Natsev
,
Christoph Bregler
Tutorials
Towards Relightable Volumetric Performance Capture of Humans
Organizers include:
Sean Fanello
,
Christoph Rhemann
,
Graham Fyffe
,
Jonathan Taylor
,
Sofien Bouaziz
,
Paul Debevec
,
Shahram Izadi
Learning Representations via Graph-structured Networks
Organizers include:
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Applying AutoML to Transformer Architectures
Friday, June 14, 2019
Posted by David So, Software Engineer, Google AI
Since it was introduced a few years ago, Google’s
Transformer architecture
has been applied to challenges ranging from
generating fantasy fiction
to
writing musical harmonies
. Importantly, the Transformer’s high performance has demonstrated that
feed forward neural networks
can be as effective as
recurrent neural networks
when applied to sequence tasks, such as language modeling and translation. While the Transformer and
other feed forward models
used for sequence problems are rising in popularity, their architectures are almost exclusively manually designed, in contrast to the computer vision domain where
AutoML
approaches have found
state-of-the-art models
that outperform those that are designed by hand. Naturally, we wondered if the application of AutoML in the sequence domain could be equally successful.
After conducting an
evolution-based
neural architecture search (NAS), using translation as a proxy for sequence tasks in general, we found the
Evolved Transformer
, a new Transformer architecture that demonstrates promising improvements on a variety of
natural language processing
(NLP) tasks. Not only does the Evolved Transformer achieve state-of-the-art translation results, but it also demonstrates improved performance on language modeling when compared to the original Transformer. We are
releasing this new model
as part of
Tensor2Tensor
, where it can be used for any sequence problem.
Developing the Techniques
To begin the evolutionary NAS, it was necessary for us to develop new techniques, due to the fact that the task used to evaluate the “fitness” of each architecture,
WMT’14 English-German
translation, is computationally expensive. This makes the searches more expensive than similar searches executed in the vision domain, which can leverage smaller datasets, like
CIFAR-10
. The first of these techniques is warm starting—seeding the initial evolution population with the Transformer architecture instead of random models. This helps ground the search in an area of the search space we know is strong, thereby allowing it to find better models faster.
The second technique is a new method we developed called Progressive Dynamic Hurdles (PDH), an algorithm that augments the evolutionary search to allocate more resources to the strongest candidates, in contrast to previous works, where each candidate model of the NAS is allocated the same amount of resources when it is being evaluated. PDH allows us to terminate the evaluation of a model early if it is flagrantly bad, allowing promising architectures to be awarded more resources.
The Evolved Transformer
Using these methods, we conducted a large-scale NAS on our translation task and discovered the Evolved Transformer (ET). Like most sequence to sequence (seq2seq) neural network architectures, it has an encoder that encodes the input sequence into embeddings and a decoder that uses those embeddings to construct an output sequence; in the case of translation, the input sequence is the sentence to be translated and the output sequence is the translation.
The most interesting feature of the Evolved Transformer is the
convolutional layers
at the bottom of both its encoder and decoder modules that were added in a similar branching pattern in both places (i.e. the inputs run through two separate convolutional layers before being added together).
A comparison between the Evolved Transformer and the original Transformer encoder architectures. Notice the branched convolution structure at the bottom of the module, which formed in both the encoder and decoder independently. See
our paper
for a description of the decoder.
This is particularly interesting because the encoder and decoder architectures are not shared during the NAS, so this architecture was independently discovered as being useful in both the encoder and decoder, speaking to the strength of this design. Whereas the original Transformer relied solely on self-attention, the Evolved Transformer is a hybrid, leveraging the strengths of both self-attention and wide convolution.
Evaluation of the Evolved Transformer
To test the effectiveness of this new architecture, we first compared it to the original Transformer on the English-German translation task we used during the search. We found that the Evolved Transformer had better
BLEU
and
perplexity performance
at all parameter sizes, with the biggest gain at the size compatible with mobile devices (~7 million parameters), demonstrating an efficient use of parameters. At a larger size, the Evolved Transformer reaches state-of-the-art performance on WMT’ 14 En-De with a BLEU score of 29.8 and a SacreBLEU score of 29.2.
Comparison between the Evolved Transformer and the original Transformer on WMT’14 En-De at varying sizes. The biggest gains in performance occur at smaller sizes, while ET also shows strength at larger sizes, outperforming the largest Transformer with 37.6% less parameters (models to compare are circled in green). See Table 3 in
our paper
for the exact numbers.
To test generalizability, we also compared ET to the Transformer on additional NLP tasks. First, we looked at translation using different language pairs, and found ET demonstrated improved performance, with margins similar to those seen on English-German; again, due to its efficient use of parameters, the biggest improvements were observed for medium sized models. We also compared the decoders of both models on language modeling using
LM1B
, and saw a performance improvement of nearly 2 perplexity.
Future Work
These results are the first step in exploring the application of architecture search to feed forward sequence models. The Evolved Transformer is being
open sourced
as part of
Tensor2Tensor
, where it can be used for any sequence problem. To promote reproducibility, we are also open sourcing the
search space we used for our search
and a
Colab
with an implementation of Progressive Dynamic Hurdles. We look forward to seeing what the research community does with the new model and hope that others are able to build off of these new search techniques!
Google at ICML 2019
Monday, June 10, 2019
Posted by Andrew Helton, Editor, Google AI Communications
Machine learning is a key strategic focus at Google, with highly active groups pursuing research in virtually all aspects of the field, including deep learning and more classical algorithms, exploring theory as well as application. We utilize scalable tools and architectures to build machine learning systems that enable us to solve deep scientific and engineering challenges in areas of language, speech, translation, music, visual processing and more.
As a leader in machine learning research, Google is proud to be a Sapphire Sponsor of the thirty-sixth
International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML 2019), a premier annual event supported by the
International Machine Learning Society
taking place this week in Long Beach, CA. With nearly 200 Googlers attending the conference to present publications and host workshops, we look forward to our continued collaboration with the larger machine learning research community.
If you're attending ICML 2019, we hope you'll visit the Google booth to learn more about the exciting work, creativity and fun that goes into solving some of the field's most interesting challenges, with researchers on hand to talk about
Google Research Football Environment
,
AdaNet
,
Robotics at Google
and much more. You can also learn more about the Google research being presented at ICML 2019 in the list below (Google affiliations highlighted in
blue
).
ICML 2019 Committees
Board Members include:
Andrew McCallum
,
Corinna Cortes
,
Hugo Larochelle
,
William Cohen
(Emeritus)
Senior Area Chairs include:
Charles Sutton
,
Claudio Gentile
,
Corinna Cortes
,
Kevin Murphy
,
Mehryar Mohri
,
Nati Srebro
,
Samy Bengio
,
Surya Ganguli
Area Chairs include:
Jacob Abernethy
,
William Cohen
,
Dumitru Erhan
,
Cho-Jui Hsieh
,
Chelsea Finn
,
Sergey Levine
,
Manzil Zaheer
,
Sergei Vassilvitskii
,
Boqing Gong
,
Been Kim
,
Dale Schuurmans
,
Danny Tarlow
,
Dustin Tran
,
Hanie Sedghi
,
Honglak Lee
,
Jasper Snoek
,
Lihong Li
,
Minmin Chen
,
Mohammad Norouzi
,
Nicolas Le Roux
,
Phil Long
,
Sanmi Koyejo
,
Timnit Gebru
,
Vitaly Feldman
,
Satyen Kale
,
Katherine Heller
,
Hossein Mobahi
,
Amir Globerson
,
Ilya Tolstikhin
,
Marco Cuturi
,
Sebastian Nowozin
,
Amin Karbasi
,
Ohad Shamir
,
Graham Taylor
Accepted Publications
Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations
Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer,
Mario Lučić
, Gunnar Rätsch,
Sylvain Gelly
, Bernhard Schölkopf,
Olivier Bachem
(Recipient of an ICML 2019 Best Paper Award)
Learning to Groove with Inverse Sequence Transformations
Jon Gillick
,
Adam Roberts
,
Jesse Engel
,
Douglas Eck
, David Bamman
Metric-Optimized Example Weights
Sen Zhao
,
Mahdi Milani Fard
,
Harikrishna Narasimhan
,
Maya Gupta
HOList: An Environment for Machine Learning of Higher Order Logic Theorem Proving
Kshitij Bansal
,
Sarah Loos
,
Markus Rabe
,
Christian Szegedy
,
Stewart Wilcox
Learning to Clear the Market
Weiran Shen,
Sebastien Lahaie
,
Renato Paes Leme
Shape Constraints for Set Functions
Andrew Cotter
,
Maya Gupta
,
Heinrich Jiang
,
Erez Louidor
,
James Muller
,
Tamann Narayan
,
Serena Wang
,
Tao Zhu
Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networks
Han Zhang
,
Ian Goodfellow
, Dimitris Metaxas,
Augustus Odena
High-Fidelity Image Generation With Fewer Labels
Mario Lučić
, Michael Tschannen,
Marvin Ritter
,
Xiaohua Zhai
,
Olivier Bachem
,
Sylvain Gelly
Learning Optimal Linear Regularizers
Matthew Streeter
DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learning
Carles Gelada
,
Saurabh Kumar
, Jacob Buckman,
Ofir Nachum
,
Marc G. Bellemare
kernelPSI: a Post-Selection Inference Framework for Nonlinear Variable Selection
Lotfi Slim, Clément Chatelain, Chloe-Agathe Azencott,
Jean-Philippe Vert
Learning from a Learner
Alexis Jacq,
Matthieu Geist
, Ana Paiva,
Olivier Pietquin
Rate Distortion For Model Compression:From Theory To Practice
Weihao Gao,
Yu-Han Liu
,
Chong Wang
, Sewoong Oh
An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Density
Behrooz Ghorbani,
Shankar Krishnan
,
Ying Xiao
Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objects
Yujia Li, Chenjie Gu,
Thomas Dullien
, Oriol Vinyals, Pushmeet Kohli
Subspace Robust Wasserstein Distances
François-Pierre Paty,
Marco Cuturi
Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraints
Andrew Cotter
,
Maya Gupta
,
Heinrich Jiang
, Nathan Srebro, Karthik Sridharan,
Serena Wang
, Blake Woodworth, Seungil You
The Effect of Network Width on Stochastic Gradient Descent and Generalization: an Empirical Study
Daniel Park
,
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
,
Quoc Le
, Samuel Smith
A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processes
Matthieu Geist
, Bruno Scherrer,
Olivier Pietquin
Area Attention
Yang Li
,
Łukasz Kaiser
,
Samy Bengio
,
Si Si
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Mingxing Tan
,
Quoc Le
Static Automatic Batching In TensorFlow
Ashish Agarwal
The Evolved Transformer
David So
,
Quoc Le
,
Chen Liang
Policy Certificates: Towards Accountable Reinforcement Learning
Christoph Dann,
Lihong Li,
Wei Wei
, Emma Brunskill
Self-similar Epochs: Value in Arrangement
Eliav Buchnik
,
Edith Cohen
,
Avinatan Hasidim
,
Yossi Matias
The Value Function Polytope in Reinforcement Learning
Robert Dadashi
,
Marc G. Bellemare
,
Adrien Ali Taiga
,
Nicolas Le Roux
,
Dale Schuurmans
Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noise
Justin Gilmer
,
Nicolas Ford
,
Nicholas Carlini
,
Ekin Cubuk
SOLAR: Deep Structured Representations for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Marvin Zhang, Sharad Vikram, Laura Smith, Pieter Abbeel,
Matthew Johnson
, Sergey Levine
Garbage In, Reward Out: Bootstrapping Exploration in Multi-Armed Bandits
Branislav Kveton
,
Csaba Szepesvari
, Sharan Vaswani, Zheng Wen, Tor Lattimore, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh
Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognition
Yao Qin,
Nicholas Carlini
, Garrison Cottrell,
Ian Goodfellow
,
Colin Raffel
Direct Uncertainty Prediction for Medical Second Opinions
Maithra Raghu
,
Katy Blumer
,
Rory Sayres
, Ziad Obermeyer, Bobby Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, Jon Kleinberg
A Large-Scale Study on Regularization and Normalization in GANs
Karol Kurach
,
Mario Lučić
,
Xiaohua Zhai
,
Marcin Michalski
,
Sylvain Gelly
Learning a Compressed Sensing Measurement Matrix via Gradient Unrolling
Shanshan Wu, Alex Dimakis, Sujay Sanghavi,
Felix Yu
,
Daniel Holtmann-Rice
,
Dmitry Storcheus
,
Afshin Rostamizadeh
,
Sanjiv Kumar
NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networks
Yandong Li, Lijun Li, Liqiang Wang, Tong Zhang,
Boqing Gong
Distributed Weighted Matching via Randomized Composable Coresets
Sepehr Assadi,
Mohammad Hossein Bateni
,
Vahab Mirrokni
Monge blunts Bayes: Hardness Results for Adversarial Training
Zac Cranko,
Aditya Menon
, Richard Nock, Cheng Soon Ong, Zhan Shi, Christian Walder
Generalized Majorization-Minimization
Sobhan Naderi Parizi
,
Kun He
,
Reza Aghajani
,
Stan Sclaroff
,
Pedro Felzenszwalb
NAS-Bench-101: Towards Reproducible Neural Architecture Search
Chris Ying
, Aaron Klein,
Eric Christiansen
,
Esteban Real
,
Kevin Murphy
, Frank Hutter
Variational Russian Roulette for Deep Bayesian Nonparametrics
Kai Xu, Akash Srivastava,
Charles Sutton
Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization
Zhenxun Zhuang,
Ashok Cutkosky
, Francesco Orabona
Improved Parallel Algorithms for Density-Based Network Clustering
Mohsen Ghaffari,
Silvio Lattanzi
, Slobodan Mitrović
The Advantages of Multiple Classes for Reducing Overfitting from Test Set Reuse
Vitaly Feldman
,
Roy Frostig
,
Moritz Hardt
Submodular Streaming in All Its Glory: Tight Approximation, Minimum Memory and Low Adaptive Complexity
Ehsan Kazemi, Marko Mitrovic,
Morteza Zadimoghaddam
,
Silvio Lattanzi
, Amin Karbasi
Hiring Under Uncertainty
Manish Purohit
,
Sreenivas Gollapudi
, Manish Raghavan
A Tree-Based Method for Fast Repeated Sampling of Determinantal Point Processes
Jennifer Gillenwater
,
Alex Kulesza
,
Zelda Mariet
,
Sergei Vassilvtiskii
Statistics and Samples in Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Mark Rowland,
Robert Dadashi
,
Saurabh Kumar
, Remi Munos,
Marc G. Bellemare
, Will Dabney
Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Exploration
Elad Hazan
,
Sham Kakade
,
Karan Singh
, Abby Van Soest
Active Learning with Disagreement Graphs
Corinna Cortes
,
Giulia DeSalvo,
,
Mehryar Mohri
,
Ningshan Zhang
,
Claudio Gentile
MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixing
Sami Abu-El-Haija,
Bryan Perozzi
,
Amol Kapoor
, Nazanin Alipourfard, Kristina Lerman, Hrayr Harutyunyan, Greg Ver Steeg, Aram Galstyan
Understanding the Impact of Entropy on Policy Optimization
Zafarali Ahmed
,
Nicolas Le Roux
,
Mohammad Norouzi
,
Dale Schuurmans
Matrix-Free Preconditioning in Online Learning
Ashok Cutkosky
,
Tamas Sarlos
State-Reification Networks: Improving Generalization by Modeling the Distribution of Hidden Representations
Alex Lamb, Jonathan Binas, Anirudh Goyal, Sandeep Subramanian, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Yoshua Bengio,
Michael Mozer
Online Convex Optimization in Adversarial Markov Decision Processes
Aviv Rosenberg,
Yishay Mansour
Bounding User Contributions: A Bias-Variance Trade-off in Differential Privacy
Kareem Amin
,
Alex Kulesza
,
Andres Munoz Medina
,
Sergei Vassilvtiskii
Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Models
Takashi Ishida, Gang Niu,
Aditya Menon
, Masashi Sugiyama
Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels
Danijar Hafner
,
Timothy Lillicrap,
Ian Fischer
,
Ruben Villegas
,
David Ha
,
Honglak Lee
,
James Davidson
Unifying Orthogonal Monte Carlo Methods
Krzysztof Choromanski
, Mark Rowland, Wenyu Chen, Adrian Weller
Differentially Private Learning of Geometric Concepts
Haim Kaplan
,
Yishay Mansour
,
Yossi Matias
, Uri Stemmer
Online Learning with Sleeping Experts and Feedback Graphs
Corinna Cortes
,
Giulia DeSalvo
,
Claudio Gentile
,
Mehryar Mohri
, Scott Yang
Adaptive Scale-Invariant Online Algorithms for Learning Linear Models
Michal Kempka, Wojciech Kotlowski,
Manfred K. Warmuth
TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzing
Augustus Odena
, Catherine Olsson,
David Andersen
,
Ian Goodfellow
Online Control with Adversarial Disturbances
Naman Agarwal
,
Brian Bullins
,
Elad Hazan
,
Sham Kakade
,
Karan Singh
Adversarial Online Learning with Noise
Alon Resler,
Yishay Mansour
Escaping Saddle Points with Adaptive Gradient Methods
Matthew Staib,
Sashank Reddi
,
Satyen Kale
,
Sanjiv Kumar
, Suvrit Sra
Fairness Risk Measures
Robert Williamson,
Aditya Menon
DBSCAN++: Towards Fast and Scalable Density Clustering
Jennifer Jang,
Heinrich Jiang
Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regret
Alon Cohen
,
Tomer Koren
,
Yishay Mansour
Understanding and correcting pathologies in the training of learned optimizers
Luke Metz
,
Niru Maheswaranathan
,
Jeremy Nixon
,
Daniel Freeman
,
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP
Neil Houlsby
,
Andrei Giurgiu
, Stanislaw Jastrzebski,
Bruna Morrone
,
Quentin De Laroussilhe
,
Andrea Gesmundo
,
Mona Attariyan
,
Sylvain Gelly
Efficient Full-Matrix Adaptive Regularization
Naman Agarwal
, Brian Bullins,
Xinyi Chen
,
Elad Hazan
, Karan Singh, Cyril Zhang, Yi Zhang
Efficient On-Device Models Using Neural Projections
Sujith Ravi
Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglement
Elliot Creager, David Madras, Joern-Henrik Jacobsen, Marissa Weis,
Kevin Swersky
, Toniann Pitassi, Richard Zemel
Recursive Sketches for Modular Deep Learning
Badih Ghazi
,
Rina Panigrahy
,
Joshua Wang
POLITEX: Regret Bounds for Policy Iteration Using Expert Prediction
Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Peter L. Bartlett, Kush Bhatia,
Nevena Lazić
, Csaba Szepesvári, Gellért Weisz
Anytime Online-to-Batch, Optimism and Acceleration
Ashok Cutkosky
Insertion Transformer: Flexible Sequence Generation via Insertion Operations
Mitchell Stern
,
William Chan
,
Jamie Kiros
,
Jakob Uszkoreit
Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labels
Kimin Lee, Sukmin Yun, Kibok Lee,
Honglak Lee
, Bo Li, Jinwoo Shin
A Better k-means++ Algorithm via Local Search
Silvio Lattanzi
,
Christian Sohler
Analyzing and Improving Representations with the Soft Nearest Neighbor Loss
Nicholas Frosst
,
Nicolas Papernot
,
Geoffrey Hinton
Learning to Generalize from Sparse and Underspecified Rewards
Rishabh Agarwal
,
Chen Liang
,
Dale Schuurmans
,
Mohammad Norouzi
MeanSum: A Neural Model for Unsupervised Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization
Eric Chu,
Peter Liu
CHiVE: Varying Prosody in Speech Synthesis with a Linguistically Driven Dynamic Hierarchical Conditional Variational Network
Tom Kenter
,
Vincent Wan
,
Chun-An Chan
,
Rob Clark
, Jakub Vit
Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited
Simon Kornblith
,
Mohammad Norouzi
,
Honglak Lee
,
Geoffrey Hinton
Online Algorithms for Rent-Or-Buy with Expert Advice
Sreenivas Gollapudi
, Debmalya Panigrahi
Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck via Learnable Monotonic Pointwise Non-linearities
Octavian Ganea,
Sylvain Gelly
, Gary Becigneul,
Aliaksei Severyn
Non-monotone Submodular Maximization with Nearly Optimal Adaptivity and Query Complexity
Matthew Fahrbach,
Vahab Mirrokni
,
Morteza Zadimoghaddam
Agnostic Federated Learning
Mehryar Mohri
,
Gary Sivek
,
Ananda Theertha Suresh
Categorical Feature Compression via Submodular Optimization
Mohammad Hossein Bateni
,
Lin Chen
,
Hossein Esfandiari
,
Thomas Fu
,
Vahab Mirrokni
,
Afshin Rostamizadeh
Cross-Domain 3D Equivariant Image Embeddings
Carlos Esteves,
Avneesh Sud
, Zhengyi Luo, Kostas Daniilidis,
Ameesh Makadia
Faster Algorithms for Binary Matrix Factorization
Ravi Kumar
,
Rina Panigrahy
,
Ali Rahimi
, David Woodruff
On Variational Bounds of Mutual Information
Ben Poole
,
Sherjil Ozair
, Aaron Van Den Oord,
Alex Alemi
,
George Tucker
Guided Evolutionary Strategies: Augmenting Random Search with Surrogate Gradients
Niru Maheswaranathan
,
Luke Metz
,
George Tucker
,
Dami Choi
,
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
Semi-Cyclic Stochastic Gradient Descent
Hubert Eichner
,
Tomer Koren
,
Brendan McMahan
, Nathan Srebro,
Kunal Talwar
Stochastic Deep Networks
Gwendoline de Bie, Gabriel Peyré,
Marco Cuturi
Workshops
1st Workshop on Understanding and Improving Generalization in Deep Learning
Organizers Include:
Dilip Krishnan
,
Hossein Mobahi
Invited Speaker:
Chelsea Finn
Climate Change: How Can AI Help?
Invited Speaker:
John Platt
Generative Modeling and Model-Based Reasoning for Robotics and AI
Organizers Include:
Dumitru Erhan
,
Sergey Levine
,
Kimberly Stachenfeld
Invited Speaker:
Chelsea Finn
Human In the Loop Learning (HILL)
Organizers Include:
Been Kim
ICML 2019 Time Series Workshop
Organizers Include:
Vitaly Kuznetsov
Joint Workshop on On-Device Machine Learning & Compact Deep Neural Network Representations (ODML-CDNNR)
Organizers Include:
Sujith Ravi
,
Zornitsa Kozareva
Negative Dependence: Theory and Applications in Machine Learning
Organizers Include:
Jennifer Gillenwater
,
Alex Kulesza
Reinforcement Learning for Real Life
Organizers Include:
Lihong Li
Invited Speaker:
Craig Boutilier
Uncertainty and Robustness in Deep Learning
Organizers Include:
Justin Gilmer
Theoretical Physics for Deep Learning
Organizers Include:
Jaehoon Lee
,
Jeffrey Pennington
,
Yasaman Bahri
Workshop on the Security and Privacy of Machine Learning
Organizers Include:
Nicolas Papernot
Invited Speaker:
Been Kim
Exploration in Reinforcement Learning Workshop
Organizers Include:
Benjamin Eysenbach
,
Surya Bhupatiraju
,
Shixiang Gu
ICML Workshop on Imitation, Intent, and Interaction (I3)
Organizers Include:
Sergey Levine
,
Chelsea Finn
Invited Speaker:
Pierre Sermanet
Identifying and Understanding Deep Learning Phenomena
Organizers Include:
Hanie Sedghi
,
Samy Bengio
,
Kenji Hata
,
Maithra Raghu
,
Ali Rahimi
,
Ying Xiao
Workshop on Multi-Task and Lifelong Reinforcement Learning
Organizers Include:
Sarath Chandar
,
Chelsea Finn
Invited Speakers:
Karol Hausman
,
Sergey Levine
Workshop on Self-Supervised Learning
Organizers Include:
Pierre Sermanet
Invertible Neural Networks and Normalizing Flows
Organizers Include:
Rianne Van den Berg
,
Danilo J. Rezende
Invited Speakers:
Eric Jang
,
Laurent Dinh
Labels
accessibility
ACL
ACM
Acoustic Modeling
Adaptive Data Analysis
ads
adsense
adwords
Africa
AI
AI for Social Good
Algorithms
Android
Android Wear
API
App Engine
App Inventor
April Fools
Art
Audio
Augmented Reality
Australia
Automatic Speech Recognition
AutoML
Awards
BigQuery
Cantonese
Chemistry
China
Chrome
Cloud Computing
Collaboration
Compression
Computational Imaging
Computational Photography
Computer Science
Computer Vision
conference
conferences
Conservation
correlate
Course Builder
crowd-sourcing
CVPR
Data Center
Data Discovery
data science
datasets
Deep Learning
DeepDream
DeepMind
distributed systems
Diversity
Earth Engine
economics
Education
Electronic Commerce and Algorithms
electronics
EMEA
EMNLP
Encryption
entities
Entity Salience
Environment
Europe
Exacycle
Expander
expla
Faculty Institute
Faculty Summit
Flu Trends
Fusion Tables
gamification
Gboard
Gmail
Google Accelerated Science
Google Books
Google Brain
Google Cloud Platform
Google Docs
Google Drive
Google Genomics
Google Maps
Google Photos
Google Play Apps
Google Science Fair
Google Sheets
Google Translate
Google Trips
Google Voice Search
Google+
Government
grants
Graph
Graph Mining
Hardware
HCI
Health
High Dynamic Range Imaging
ICCV
ICLR
ICML
ICSE
Image Annotation
Image Classification
Image Processing
Inbox
India
Information Retrieval
internationalization
Internet of Things
Interspeech
IPython
Journalism
jsm
jsm2011
K-12
Kaggle
KDD
Keyboard Input
Klingon
Korean
Labs
Linear Optimization
localization
Low-Light Photography
Machine Hearing
Machine Intelligence
Machine Learning
Machine Perception
Machine Translation
Magenta
MapReduce
market algorithms
Market Research
materials science
Mixed Reality
ML
ML Fairness
MOOC
Moore's Law
Multimodal Learning
NAACL
Natural Language Processing
Natural Language Understanding
Network Management
Networks
Neural Networks
NeurIPS
Nexus
Ngram
NIPS
NLP
On-device Learning
open source
operating systems
Optical Character Recognition
optimization
osdi
osdi10
patents
Peer Review
ph.d. fellowship
PhD Fellowship
PhotoScan
Physics
PiLab
Pixel
Policy
Professional Development
Proposals
Public Data Explorer
publication
Publications
Quantum AI
Quantum Computing
Recommender Systems
Reinforcement Learning
renewable energy
Research
Research Awards
resource optimization
Responsible AI
Robotics
schema.org
Search
search ads
Security and Privacy
Self-Supervised Learning
Semantic Models
Semi-supervised Learning
SIGCOMM
SIGMOD
Site Reliability Engineering
Social Networks
Software
Sound Search
Speech
Speech Recognition
statistics
Structured Data
Style Transfer
Supervised Learning
Systems
TensorBoard
TensorFlow
TPU
Translate
trends
TTS
TV
UI
University Relations
UNIX
Unsupervised Learning
User Experience
video
Video Analysis
Virtual Reality
Vision Research
Visiting Faculty
Visualization
VLDB
Voice Search
Wiki
wikipedia
WWW
Year in Review
YouTube
Archive
2022
Jan
2021
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2020
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2019
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2018
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2017
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2016
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2015
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2014
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2013
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2012
Dec
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2011
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2010
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2009
Dec
Nov
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Jul
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
2007
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Feb
2006
Dec
Nov
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
Apr
Mar
Feb
Feed
Follow @googleai
Give us feedback in our
Product Forums
.
